« January 2007 | Main | March 2007 »

February 19, 2007

Primary Innovation Obstacle: Old Ways Die Hard

Old ways of doing things most always will stand in the way of an innovative idea. For an innovative idea to be accepted as a social norm, it is often our human behavior and not the innovation concept that needs to transform. Watch this comical video on innovation :)

February 14, 2007

Communities of Practice: 'The Way' of Innovative Organizations

1-What do CoP's (communities of practice) and SI (sustainable innovation) have in common?
2-How does CoP cement the foundation for continuous (sustained) innovation within an organization?
3-And why in the world is that important to your business?

Communities of Practice:
Definition
Theory
Knowledge Ecology
Cultivation

Sustainable Innovation: A Growing Trend

Take a look at this feed. These incoming articles demonstrate that the concept of sustainable innovation is no longer an idea; it's an application.

February 9, 2007

Concentrix Management: How To Cross Pollinate Innovation

Concentrix Management (CM) is a model for distributing and managing information with the intent to cross pollinate ideas and concepts across sub-groups so that each part of the system knows about the 'whole' of which all working groups within it reside - without overloading any one person.

--------------------------------------------
We are each at the centers of our own Universe.
How does yours relate to mine?
--------------------------------------------

CMprocess.jpg

CM is an important communications tool that allows innovation to emerge with an enterprise. It is a way of distributing (rather than isolating) knowledge capital within an organization. It is based on new physics theory that proposes there are infinite centers to the Universe. Thus each of us defines our own unique perspective; one that is partial and necessary within an infinite whole. At the same time, each of us carries responsibilities for identifying with other unique parts, thereby sharing knowledge both within our own group(s) also with others that are beyond the boundaries of our group's identity. These 'crossings' are otherwise known as COMMUNICATION.

Thus, CM allows for broad levels of interdependent knowledge sets to be transferred and stored within different sub groupings (such as divisions, committees, etc.) of a greater whole (such as a company, community, or other organizing fractal). This interdependent webbing process creates an inherently more sustainable system than one which isolates knowledge through traditional proprietary or need-to-know behaviors. It encourages relationships through shared trust rather than through today's more traditional ownership method for containing knowledge. The result is an enterprise that is not only more resilient to change, more innovative, and responsive to its surrounding environments and markets.

Using CM, a company's behavior becomes 'morphic' (new myth) rather than 'phoenix' (old myth) oriented by nature, meaning that the whole-system can now shift itself from one state of being into another without a physical death in between. Just as the phoenix bird needed to die in order to generate new life (old myth), instead now our organizations can begin to rebirth themselves more like a caterpillar does as it changes into a butterfly (new myth).

Essential for this type of transformation, is 'Concentrix Management', which allows the enterprise to unlock itself from a common center, way of thinking, or method of behavior.

CM Fundamental Architecture

CMinterdependencies.jpg


---------------------------------------------------------
Concentrix Management Outline

Putting Collaborative Ideas Into Action:

A Guide tool for generating collaborative corporate principles, strategy, and realizing integration of the 18-Domains.


---------------------------------------------------------
Collaboration structures (4 types)

Type 1: CONVERSATION CAFES
Conversations done irregularly (1 to 2 month window), for individuals ... company staff & external stakeholders, the blood/fluid of the organization, amorphous [process/flow], 13x12=156 maximum number of employees

Type 2 : POD CLUSTERS
Meetings done weekly at same time, for company group relations, the emotions/personality of the company boundary(s) [patterns/identity], 13 fixed groups of spheres

Type 3: COLLABORATORIES
Held monthly, all involved, (for whole company, managed by 13 self-selected facilitators) the body/shape of the organization, crystalline [structure/constructs]

Type 4: CHARRETTE ACCELERATORS
For internal/external stakeholder alignment, provides the conscious movement/direction, managed by OL team, the spirit/essence of the organization [wholeness, integration of structure, pattern, process]

CMcrosspollearning.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------
Fundamental Strategy Developments

1- CM provides method for delegation of responsibilities

2- Ideas relating to 'Building Sustainable Learning Communities' using concept of creating a 'Sustained Technology Renaissance' for the 21st century.

3- Decision Making Process Chart : 1-What 2-Time Frame 3-Considerations 4-Costs 5-Team(s) 6-Fluencial Resources (input & output)

4- Method(s) for reporting: (i.e. communication to other stake holder individuals and teams

5- An info-structure based on communication

6- Project investment strategy to be based on value-add money sourcing

7- Open door policy (contracts describe alternative view ... privacy yes, proprietary no)

8- Description of an RTC Free Agent

9- Allow agreement

10- Whole-part-whole cycles of a meeting

11- A mediation process for when issues are not resolvable within supporting spheres (managed by main RTC large sphere)

12- Use of business template to account for time and money and people issues

13- A protocol guide generated by multi-sphere collaboration, managed by main RTC large sphere)

14- Permission for groups to dissolve (core pod as example)

15- Feedback learning loops that includes a synthesis stage: experiment (source of innovation), evaluate (based on the question), correct (no absolute answers)

16- Tactical (immediate term activities) vs strategic (long term envisioning)

17- Communication Tools: Virtual: use of www.smartgroups.com listserv for online communications, Physical: every Wednesday is an open-technology meeting to align CM ‘fluential spheres

18- Board's responsibility/role

19- Relationships (circle) and strategic development (triangle)--- fractal nature (one in the many in the one) spherical onion-like ( center 1 -> first layer 12 -> second layer 44)

20- Multi-centered organization

21- 12 cells around 1 cell (total of 13 centers)

22- Simplest form of company (internal community)

23- Each of 13 cells responsible for/to 12 other cells within company, first layer of onion

24- Simplest form of stakeholder relations (external relations)

25- Each of 13 cells responsible for/to 44 cells outside of company, second layer of onion


---------------------------------------------------------
Concentrix Management and Collaboration Structures (Items in Package)

- FUNDAMENTALS: rules?, and/or principles of CM (must be simple and no more than one page) (dot in center)

- TASKING: time, money, resources, people chart/array

- COMMUNICATIONS: people responsibility connection map/matrix

- 3BL: Conceptual tools for integrating sustainable management into planning and practices

- ORG. LEARNING: practices, schedule, procedure, principles for collaborative learning experiences

- Individual Sphere meetings use Learning Circle process diagram

- Individuals from each group are self-selected as responsible for each other group to report and note other group alignment issues

- Sphere PROTOCOLS

- PROCEDURAL: Individual - Each sphere creates and manages their own protocol procedure doc and make it available to all other spheres

- REPORTING: Collective spheres- All spheres together decide on a common reporting template to be used by all spheres for cross-sphere reporting (monthly or weekly) RTC sphere manages it)

- Both single and group of spheres meets on a Common day for all meetings, Monthly Learning Exchange Market, Weekly Spheres Meetings: (except for day of exchange market)

- Groups are responsible to each other via listserv reporting and scheduling

- Cross-pollination of spheres done by each individual in each sphere choosing 1 or more other spheres to connect with someone in those spheres (not necessarily facilitator for they are merely a focal point for delegation, report holding, etc

-Organizational charting

- Global circle people connections (org-like) chart goes with individual spherical org chart

- Global hierarchical task chart describing basics: what, time, costs,


---------------------------------------------------------
Tentative Spheres and Facilitator Assignments
TBD


---------------------------------------------------------
Keys to concentrix management strategy development:

- learning exchange markets
- organizational geometries

CMnotesketch.jpg

February 5, 2007

Defining the Innovation Economy

Podcast from iInnovate http://iinnovate.blogspot.com/

LISTEN UP ...

Geoffrey Moore -

VC, Consultant, and Bestselling Author of Crossing the Chasm ... Geoffrey Moore is a VC with Mohr Davidow Ventures, consultant and, most famously, the bestselling author of Crossing the Chasm, Inside the Tornado and Dealing with Darwin.
http://iinnovate.blogspot.com/2007/01/geoffrey-moore-bestselling-author-of.html

Talks about:

-Darwin vs Ecosystems
-Competition vs Altruism
-Self limiting boundaries
-Google as aggressive organism
-Patterns of success
-Social networks (web 2.0 latest)
-Core vs Content Innovation
-Morphing from strengths
-NonPharma-based Life Sciences trend
-Renewable energy trend
-Software as a medium (has evolved from a product)
-Digitation of Culture (online phenomena)
-Choosing who to hang out with
-Disruptive technologies
-How free online tools are shifting the economic model
-From gimmick innovation to innovation that points to a better way of doing (ex: virgin airway)